Tuni | Telugu Vaadi TV: In a shocking street interview that has gone viral across Telugu social media, a woman — now dubbed as “Public Aunty” — delivered an emotional and fiery reaction to the Tuni case involving Narayana Rao. The incident, which involves an elderly man and a 13-year-old girl from a Gurukul school, has sparked outrage, debate, and reflection across Andhra Pradesh.
The Case That Shocked Tuni
The Tuni case gained national attention after a video surfaced showing an elderly man, Narayana Rao (aged between 60–70), with a minor girl in an orchard. The girl, reportedly a student from a local Gurukul school, appeared distressed. The video, filmed by locals, quickly went viral, leading to police intervention and, soon after, the mysterious death of Narayana Rao — believed to be either a suicide or custodial incident.
In the midst of this controversy, “Public Aunty” offered a voice of raw outrage and community frustration. Her words captured the moral pulse of the public and the anger many citizens felt after the footage surfaced.
“He Took Her With Bad Intentions” — Aunty Speaks Without Filters
At the start of the interview, Public Aunty firmly rejected claims that the old man was related to the girl. “He’s not her grandfather, not her uncle — he’s nothing,” she declared, dismissing the story that he had taken her “to the bathroom.”
“If that were true, why was her top removed?” she asked bluntly. “No decent man takes a 13-year-old girl alone into an orchard. He went there with durr-buddi (evil intent).”
Her fiery delivery, mixed with raw emotion, reflected the public’s growing disgust over recurring reports of crimes against minors — especially when those incidents involve elders or authority figures.
“Creation Itself Punished Him” — Her Reaction to Narayana Rao’s Death
When asked about Narayana Rao’s death, “Public Aunty” showed no sympathy. “People are calling it suicide. I call it justice,” she said, adding that “the universe itself destroyed him for his sins.”
She referred to his death as “karma,” asserting, “He went there to destroy a child’s life, but his own ended instead. That’s God’s justice — no court needed.”
Her comments have divided viewers — some praised her for her unapologetic stand, while others questioned her lack of compassion, suggesting the truth behind his death remains uncertain. Yet, her words resonated deeply with those who believe in moral retribution beyond legal systems.
“The School Is Also Responsible” — Calls for Accountability
Throughout the interview, “Public Aunty” placed equal blame on the Gurukul school management and wardens. “How did an outsider take a girl out without permission?” she demanded. “Was there no security? Or did they take a bribe?”
Her accusations were direct — claiming that school authorities must be held accountable for negligence, or worse, corruption. She emphasized that “without money involved, such access would not have been possible.”
Viewers echoed her questions online, demanding a full inquiry into the school’s role and the apparent lack of child protection measures.
Rejecting Political Blame Games
When reporters attempted to bring up political angles — with the YCP and TDP parties accusing each other — “Public Aunty” dismissed it outright. “This is not about politics,” she said sharply. “It’s about a 13-year-old girl. Why are we arguing over which party is responsible instead of why it happened?”
Her statement cut through the noise, reminding viewers that morality and justice should outweigh party lines. “Stop playing politics with a child’s pain,” she added, as onlookers clapped in agreement.
“If the Video Didn’t Come Out, No One Would Know”
“Public Aunty” also defended the people who filmed the incident, calling them “the real heroes.” She argued that without the viral video, the truth might have been buried forever. “Who would believe the girl? People always question the victim. The camera gave her justice.”
This comment sparked online discussion about the role of citizen journalism — and how mobile phones, in such cases, have become tools of truth rather than intrusion. “Sometimes, filming is not wrong — it’s necessary,” she said.
Public Reaction: Moral Outrage Meets Fear
The interview spread across YouTube, X (Twitter), and Facebook within hours, gathering millions of views and thousands of comments. Some called “Public Aunty” the “voice of the people,” praising her courage to speak raw truth in front of cameras. Others warned that outrage should not replace due process and investigation.
Still, her passionate tone and straightforward delivery resonated with ordinary citizens who feel justice often moves too slowly in cases involving minors. “She said what the courts can’t say openly,” one commenter wrote.
Legal and Ethical Questions Remain
Despite the strong public reaction, several unanswered questions linger. Police are investigating whether Narayana Rao’s death was a suicide or involved external pressure. Meanwhile, activists are demanding tighter school safety policies and background checks on all individuals with access to minors.
Child rights advocates emphasize that every institution — from schools to parents — must take responsibility. “Blaming one man won’t fix the system,” said one Hyderabad-based lawyer. “Public outrage must push for structural change.”
Conclusion: A Mirror to Society’s Anger
The Tuni case and the viral “Public Aunty” interview expose the raw emotion of a public tired of seeing repeated cases of abuse, corruption, and silence. Whether one agrees with her blunt tone or not, her voice echoes the sentiment of thousands who believe India’s moral compass must be reset.
Her statement — “He went to destroy a child, but destroyed himself” — captures both the poetic anger and the desperation of a society demanding accountability. Beyond politics and headlines, it is a reminder that no crime against children should be brushed aside, and no system should enable such crimes to happen again.
